The Asian Commercial Sex Scene  

Go Back   The Asian Commercial Sex Scene > For stuff you can't discuss with your Facebook Account > Coffee Shop Talk of a non sexual Nature

Notices

Coffee Shop Talk of a non sexual Nature Visit Sam's Alfresco Heaven. Singapore's best Alfresco Coffee Experience! If you're up to your ears with all this Sex Talk and would like to take a break from it all to discuss other interesting aspects of life in Singapore,  pop over and join in the fun.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 14-05-2014, 02:00 PM
Sammyboy RSS Feed Sammyboy RSS Feed is offline
Sam's RSS Feed Bot - I'm not Human. Don't talk to me.
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 454,745
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 10000241 / Power: 3356
Sammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond reputeSammyboy RSS Feed has a reputation beyond repute
Thumbs up Wah FTs also involved in anTiPAP activities?

An honorable member of the Coffee Shop Has Just Posted the Following:

I wonder who is he fighting for? SINGAPOREANS WHO ARE ANTI-FTs? It is a strange world out there.

SINGAPORE: One of the five boys allegedly involved in a vandalism case in Toa Payoh has had a gag order application dismissed by a district judge on Wednesday.

David William Graaskov, 17, is alleged to have been part of the group that sprayed profane graffiti denigrating the People's Action Party and the police at Block 85A, Toa Payoh Lorong 4, on May 7.

Graaskov's lawyer, Mr Choo Zheng Xi, had applied for a gag order to be imposed, to prevent the publication of any information that may lead to the identification of his client.

Mr Choo said that, if granted, he would use the gag order as a basis for compelling websites to take down any offending material.


The prosecution objected to the application, saying that the law prohibiting the identification of witnesses was generally used to protect victims, especially in cases involving sexual offences.


In this case, Mr Choo was seeking a gag order in respect of an accused person, the prosecution added.


Graaskov's lawyer was unable to cite a precedent in which a gag order had been imposed on an accused person.

District Judge Eddy Tham ruled that a gag order was "inappropriate" and dismissed Mr Choo's application, the Attorney-General's Chambers said.


Click here to view the whole thread at www.sammyboy.com.
Advert Space Available
Bypass censorship with https://1.1.1.1

Cloudflare 1.1.1.1
Reply



Bookmarks

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +8. The time now is 07:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copywrong © Samuel Leong 2006 ~ 2023 ph